//===- LoopAnalysisManager.cpp - Loop analysis management -----------------===// // // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure // // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAnalysisManager.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/GlobalsModRef.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/MemorySSA.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.h" #include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" using namespace llvm; namespace llvm { /// Enables memory ssa as a dependency for loop passes in legacy pass manager. cl::opt EnableMSSALoopDependency( "enable-mssa-loop-dependency", cl::Hidden, cl::init(false), cl::desc("Enable MemorySSA dependency for loop pass manager")); // Explicit template instantiations and specialization defininitions for core // template typedefs. template class AllAnalysesOn; template class AnalysisManager; template class InnerAnalysisManagerProxy; template class OuterAnalysisManagerProxy; bool LoopAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy::Result::invalidate( Function &F, const PreservedAnalyses &PA, FunctionAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) { // First compute the sequence of IR units covered by this proxy. We will want // to visit this in postorder, but because this is a tree structure we can do // this by building a preorder sequence and walking it backwards. We also // want siblings in forward program order to match the LoopPassManager so we // get the preorder with siblings reversed. SmallVector PreOrderLoops = LI->getLoopsInReverseSiblingPreorder(); // If this proxy or the loop info is going to be invalidated, we also need // to clear all the keys coming from that analysis. We also completely blow // away the loop analyses if any of the standard analyses provided by the // loop pass manager go away so that loop analyses can freely use these // without worrying about declaring dependencies on them etc. // FIXME: It isn't clear if this is the right tradeoff. We could instead make // loop analyses declare any dependencies on these and use the more general // invalidation logic below to act on that. auto PAC = PA.getChecker(); bool invalidateMemorySSAAnalysis = false; if (EnableMSSALoopDependency) invalidateMemorySSAAnalysis = Inv.invalidate(F, PA); if (!(PAC.preserved() || PAC.preservedSet>()) || Inv.invalidate(F, PA) || Inv.invalidate(F, PA) || Inv.invalidate(F, PA) || Inv.invalidate(F, PA) || Inv.invalidate(F, PA) || invalidateMemorySSAAnalysis) { // Note that the LoopInfo may be stale at this point, however the loop // objects themselves remain the only viable keys that could be in the // analysis manager's cache. So we just walk the keys and forcibly clear // those results. Note that the order doesn't matter here as this will just // directly destroy the results without calling methods on them. for (Loop *L : PreOrderLoops) { // NB! `L` may not be in a good enough state to run Loop::getName. InnerAM->clear(*L, ""); } // We also need to null out the inner AM so that when the object gets // destroyed as invalid we don't try to clear the inner AM again. At that // point we won't be able to reliably walk the loops for this function and // only clear results associated with those loops the way we do here. // FIXME: Making InnerAM null at this point isn't very nice. Most analyses // try to remain valid during invalidation. Maybe we should add an // `IsClean` flag? InnerAM = nullptr; // Now return true to indicate this *is* invalid and a fresh proxy result // needs to be built. This is especially important given the null InnerAM. return true; } // Directly check if the relevant set is preserved so we can short circuit // invalidating loops. bool AreLoopAnalysesPreserved = PA.allAnalysesInSetPreserved>(); // Since we have a valid LoopInfo we can actually leave the cached results in // the analysis manager associated with the Loop keys, but we need to // propagate any necessary invalidation logic into them. We'd like to // invalidate things in roughly the same order as they were put into the // cache and so we walk the preorder list in reverse to form a valid // postorder. for (Loop *L : reverse(PreOrderLoops)) { Optional InnerPA; // Check to see whether the preserved set needs to be adjusted based on // function-level analysis invalidation triggering deferred invalidation // for this loop. if (auto *OuterProxy = InnerAM->getCachedResult(*L)) for (const auto &OuterInvalidationPair : OuterProxy->getOuterInvalidations()) { AnalysisKey *OuterAnalysisID = OuterInvalidationPair.first; const auto &InnerAnalysisIDs = OuterInvalidationPair.second; if (Inv.invalidate(OuterAnalysisID, F, PA)) { if (!InnerPA) InnerPA = PA; for (AnalysisKey *InnerAnalysisID : InnerAnalysisIDs) InnerPA->abandon(InnerAnalysisID); } } // Check if we needed a custom PA set. If so we'll need to run the inner // invalidation. if (InnerPA) { InnerAM->invalidate(*L, *InnerPA); continue; } // Otherwise we only need to do invalidation if the original PA set didn't // preserve all Loop analyses. if (!AreLoopAnalysesPreserved) InnerAM->invalidate(*L, PA); } // Return false to indicate that this result is still a valid proxy. return false; } template <> LoopAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy::Result LoopAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy::run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { return Result(*InnerAM, AM.getResult(F)); } } PreservedAnalyses llvm::getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses() { PreservedAnalyses PA; PA.preserve(); PA.preserve(); PA.preserve(); PA.preserve(); // FIXME: Uncomment this when all loop passes preserve MemorySSA // PA.preserve(); // FIXME: What we really want to do here is preserve an AA category, but that // concept doesn't exist yet. PA.preserve(); PA.preserve(); PA.preserve(); PA.preserve(); return PA; }