From 851888f9f687db85f0ed0a9c47ffa956023ad364 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: glebius <glebius@ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:19:23 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] MFhead r210539:   Document that the "ngtee" action no longer
 accepts packet, and   thus don't depend on one_pass flag anymore.

  This is a POLA violation, but it is quite difficult to restore
  the old behavior with new code. Also, the new behavior matches
  behavior of the older "tee" action, and this is more intuitive.


git-svn-id: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8@212742 ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
---
 sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8 | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8 b/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8
index 897cd3fd5..289517041 100644
--- a/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8
+++ b/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 .\"
 .\" $FreeBSD$
 .\"
-.Dd June 24, 2009
+.Dd July 27, 2010
 .Dt IPFW 8
 .Os
 .Sh NAME
@@ -859,9 +859,7 @@ accepted or continues with the next rule, depending on
 sysctl variable.
 .It Cm ngtee Ar cookie
 A copy of packet is diverted into netgraph, original
-packet is either accepted or continues with the next rule, depending on
-.Va net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass
-sysctl variable.
+packet continues with the next rule.
 See
 .Xr ng_ipfw 4
 for more information on
-- 
2.45.0