2 1. Investiate making ISOFS another UFS shared filesystem (ala FFS/MFS/LFS).
3 Since it was modelled after the inode code, we might be able to merge
4 them back. It looks like a separate (but very similar) lookup routine
5 will be needed due to the associated file stuff.
7 2. It would be nice to be able to use the vfs_cluster code.
8 Unfortunately, if the logical block size is smaller than the page size,
9 it won't work. Also, if throughtput is relatively constant for any
10 block size (as it is for the HP drive--150kbs) then clustering may not
11 buy much (or may even hurt when vfs_cluster comes up with a large sync
14 3. Seems like there should be a "notrans" or some such mount option to show
15 filenames as they really are without lower-casing. Does this make sense?