Fix lockdep between ds_lock and dd_lock in dsl_dataset_namelen()

Fix lockdep between ds_lock and dd_lock in dsl_dataset_namelen()

Booting debug kernel found an inconsistent lock dependency between
dataset's ds_lock and its directory's dd_lock.

[ 32.215336] ======================================================
[ 32.221859] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 32.221861] 4.14.90+ #8 Tainted: G           O
[ 32.221862] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 32.221863] dynamic_kernel_/4667 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 32.221864]  (&ds->ds_lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc10a4bde>] dsl_dataset_check_quota+0x9e/0x8a0 [zfs]
[ 32.221941] but task is already holding lock:
[ 32.221941]  (&dd->dd_lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc10cd8e9>] dsl_dir_tempreserve_space+0x3b9/0x1290 [zfs]
[ 32.221983] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 32.221983] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 32.221984] -> #1 (&dd->dd_lock){+.+.}:
[ 32.221992] 	__mutex_lock+0xef/0x14c0
[ 32.222049] 	dsl_dir_namelen+0xd4/0x2d0 [zfs]
[ 32.222093] 	dsl_dataset_namelen+0x2f1/0x430 [zfs]
[ 32.222142] 	verify_dataset_name_len+0xd/0x40 [zfs]
[ 32.222184] 	dmu_objset_find_dp_impl+0x5f5/0xef0 [zfs]
[ 32.222226] 	dmu_objset_find_dp_cb+0x40/0x60 [zfs]
[ 32.222235] 	taskq_thread+0x969/0x1460 [spl]
[ 32.222238] 	kthread+0x2fb/0x400
[ 32.222241] 	ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

[ 32.222241] -> #0 (&ds->ds_lock){+.+.}:
[ 32.222246] 	lock_acquire+0x14f/0x390
[ 32.222248] 	__mutex_lock+0xef/0x14c0
[ 32.222291] 	dsl_dataset_check_quota+0x9e/0x8a0 [zfs]
[ 32.222355] 	dsl_dir_tempreserve_space+0x5d2/0x1290 [zfs]
[ 32.222392] 	dmu_tx_assign+0xa61/0xdb0 [zfs]
[ 32.222436] 	zfs_create+0x4e6/0x11d0 [zfs]
[ 32.222481] 	zpl_create+0x194/0x340 [zfs]
[ 32.222484] 	lookup_open+0xa86/0x16f0
[ 32.222486] 	path_openat+0xe56/0x2490
[ 32.222488] 	do_filp_open+0x17f/0x260
[ 32.222490] 	do_sys_open+0x195/0x310
[ 32.222491] 	SyS_open+0xbf/0xf0
[ 32.222494] 	do_syscall_64+0x191/0x4f0
[ 32.222496] 	entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7

[ 32.222497] other info that might help us debug this:

[ 32.222497] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 32.222498] CPU0 			CPU1
[ 32.222498] ---- 			----
[ 32.222499] lock(&dd->dd_lock);
[ 32.222500] 				lock(&ds->ds_lock);
[ 32.222502] 				lock(&dd->dd_lock);
[ 32.222503] lock(&ds->ds_lock);
[ 32.222504] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 32.222505] 3 locks held by dynamic_kernel_/4667:
[ 32.222506] #0: (sb_writers#9){.+.+}, at: [<ffffffffaf68933c>] mnt_want_write+0x3c/0xa0
[ 32.222511] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8){++++}, at: [<ffffffffaf652cde>] path_openat+0xe2e/0x2490
[ 32.222515] #2: (&dd->dd_lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc10cd8e9>] dsl_dir_tempreserve_space+0x3b9/0x1290 [zfs]

The issue is caused by dsl_dataset_namelen() holding ds_lock, followed by
acquiring dd_lock on ds->ds_dir in dsl_dir_namelen().

However, ds->ds_dir should not be protected by ds_lock, so releasing it before
call to dsl_dir_namelen() prevents the lockdep issue

Reviewed-by: Alek Pinchuk <apinchuk@datto.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Chris Dunlop <chris@onthe.net.au>
Signed-off-by:  Michael Zhivich <mzhivich@akamai.com>
Closes #8413